Regencord - Stem cells therapy, empower your wellness

26 November

Stem Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis: Indications & Evidence

Stem Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis: indications, evidence and expectations (2026)

Last medical review: November 2025 · Reading time: 10–12 minutes

Important notice: This content is educational and does not replace an individual medical evaluation. Results may vary depending on each patient’s condition.

What knee osteoarthritis is and how it is diagnosed

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a degenerative process affecting articular cartilage and periarticular structures, often leading to pain, stiffness, functional loss and limitations in walking or sports. Diagnosis is primarily clinical (mechanical pain, brief morning stiffness, crepitus) and can be complemented by imaging when indicated—standard radiographs (e.g., Kellgren–Lawrence grading) and, in select cases, MRI to assess cartilage, menisci and synovitis. The care plan should be individualized based on KOA severity, comorbidities and functional goals.

When to consider stem cell treatments

Stem cell treatments (a form of cellular therapy under ongoing evaluation) may be considered for selected KOA patients who have not achieved adequate relief with conservative measures and are seeking complementary options within a stepwise approach.

Typical candidates

  • Symptomatic mild-to-moderate KOA (e.g., KL II–III) with pain and functional limitation despite physiotherapy, activity modification and basic pharmacologic care.
  • Patients wishing to postpone or reevaluate surgery, provided there is a reasonable indication and realistic expectations.
  • Patients willing to engage in rehabilitation and lifestyle changes (weight management, strengthening, joint “hygiene”).

Situations needing caution or potential contraindications

  • Active infection, uncontrolled bleeding disorders or hypersensitivity to product components.
  • Advanced KOA with severe structural deformity where surgical options may be more appropriate.
  • Decompensated comorbidities or high-dose immunosuppression (case-by-case assessment).

What the procedure involves and what is assessed

Depending on the protocol, autologous sources (e.g., bone marrow or adipose-derived preparations processed under quality standards) may be used, or—within regulated contexts—authorized allogeneic products. The goal is to deliver cells and associated factors into the joint environment to modulate inflammation, support a reparative microenvironment and assist joint function.

Before the procedure

  • Review of medical history, medications, goals and expectations.
  • Baseline documentation with objective scales (e.g., VAS for pain, WOMAC/KOOS for function) and imaging as clinically indicated.
  • Informed consent and explanation of the follow-up plan.

After the procedure

  • Relative joint rest during the first 24–72 hours.
  • Structured rehabilitation program: mobility, strengthening and load control.
  • Scheduled follow-ups to monitor clinical and functional progress.

Note: Preparation, processing and traceability of any cellular product should comply with quality standards and applicable regulations. Avoid unsupported promises or absolute expectations.

What the evidence says (2020–2025): a critical summary

In recent years, trials and reviews have investigated safety and potential benefit of cellular therapies in KOA. Broadly, selected studies report:

  • Short-term safety profiles that appear acceptable in regulated settings, with adverse events usually mild and transient (local pain, stiffness, low-grade fever).
  • Clinical improvements in pain and function for some patient subgroups, alongside substantial heterogeneity in protocols (cell sources, doses, number of applications, co-interventions).
  • Structural outcomes on imaging are variable; some studies suggest signals of benefit, while others show no significant changes. Longer follow-up and standardized comparators are needed.
  • Active comparators (e.g., hyaluronic acid, PRP) show mixed results across designs and populations, limiting definitive conclusions.

Prudent 2025 takeaway: safety looks favorable in qualified hands with quality controls; effect magnitude and durability can vary by patient and protocol. Decisions should be individualized, evidence-informed and aligned with patient preferences and medical judgment.

Realistic expectations and follow-up timelines

When improvements occur, they are often progressive. A reasonable follow-up schedule may include:

  • 2–6 weeks: early symptom check and rehabilitation adjustments.
  • 3 months: functional reassessment versus baseline.
  • 6–12 months: consolidation, goal review and decisions on co-interventions.

Adherence to strengthening, weight management and joint-friendly habits is essential to maximize outcomes. Avoid high-impact activities without gradual reconditioning.

Risks and side effects

In regulated contexts with standardized protocols, adverse events are typically mild and transient (local pain or swelling, flu-like symptoms, low-grade fever). Serious complications are uncommon but possible, making careful patient selection, aseptic technique, product quality and structured follow-up crucial. Seek immediate care in case of persistent fever, progressive pain, notable discharge or marked redness at the application site.

Frequently asked questions

Am I a candidate if I have already tried physiotherapy, analgesics and hyaluronic acid?

It may be considered if pain and functional limitation persist despite conservative care. Indication depends on KOA severity, your goals and a comprehensive medical evaluation.

When might I notice changes in pain or function?

Timelines vary. Some individuals report gradual improvements in the first weeks; the most informative reassessments are commonly at 3 and 6 months using objective scales.

Can damaged knee cartilage “regenerate”?

KOA involves complex structural changes. Some studies explore repair markers, but promising complete regeneration would be inappropriate. A responsible approach is to discuss possible clinical and functional improvements in selected candidates.

What risks are associated with these treatments?

Local discomfort or swelling, flu-like symptoms and low-grade fever are the most common. Serious complications are uncommon in regulated settings but warrant vigilance and scheduled follow-ups.

Do stem cell treatments replace knee replacement surgery?

Not necessarily. They may be considered as part of a stepwise management plan. In advanced KOA with deformity or failure of other measures, surgery may remain the most appropriate option.

References and further reading

  • Recent narrative and systematic reviews on cellular therapies in knee osteoarthritis (safety, pain and function).
  • Clinical guidelines for KOA focusing on exercise, weight management and interventional options.
  • Regulatory documents applicable to advanced therapy products and quality criteria.

Looking for an evaluation of your case? Our team can review your medical history, expectations and alternatives. Book a medical consultation.

Back top
Te asesoramos en línea
Elije un departamento
Asesor whatsapp Customer Service
Customer Service
Appointments
En línea